Globalization has been assessed as having led to a large variety of what has been referred to as an “extinction of experience” observed within the modern epoch. This, of course, is not only a spatial but also an interactional and perceptual withdrawal, which results in a drastic decrease of contacts with nature. These factors include urbanization, changes in carrying out our daily activities with reliance on technology, and most of our activities taking place indoors. Thus, as individuals stay indoors more often due to factors such as health or work demands, they lose a critical sense of primary interactions with nature, creating a direct line to appreciation from environmental elements. 
 
 There are much broader implications for this chasm when it comes to the topics of sustainability and people’s quality of life. According to the cognitive evaluation theory, the way backed up by the ecological theory, minimize contact with the environment results in decreased protection of the environment. In essence, periods where people seldom come across the beauty of natural ecosystems, they are hardly compelled to fight for the conservation of these natural ecosystems. This lack of interest can prevent the conserve and make environmental degradations worse. Moreover, the above gap’s consequences are observed on the psychological and physical planes, since numerous studies have indicated that interacting with natural environment results in stress decrease, elevated mood, and improved cognitive abilities. 
 
 The solution to the “extinction of experience” incorporates several strategies that can help restore nature as a part of everyday life. This gap can only be closed by proper educational programs, well designed urban planning and provision of policies that support the provision of green space and outdoor activities. Effective as a means of humanizing societies and helping with engagement with the natural environment, societies should strive to support such opportunities since this creates better ability to become responsible for the environment and implies improved well-being. This reawakening of man to incorporate nature into one’s life is not only necessary for health but for the health of the world we live in as well. 
 

 Human-nature connectedness is a complex and embrace the cognitive, affective, as well as the behavioral domains. It is the measure of how much Tightness people can feel with the nature or how much they can be connected with the nature. The connectedness dimension may be scaled from the extreme end where a person or a culture sees him or herself as an entity totally different from nature to the other extreme where the person or culture is seen as part of nature. The components of the human-nature connectedness consist of the attitudes like the extent of the identification of the person with the ecosystem, affective attitude towards nature, and the regulation of attitude between the persons and natural environment. 
 
Studies have presented a significant direct relationship between people’s level of engagement with nature and their environmental consciousness. Ecological interdependence and concern directly impact acts that can lead to sustainable environmental conservation since environmentally conscious people will recycle, conserve energy, and support policies that advance the conversation. Such a relationship helps to develop a sense of responsibility and a strong conscious desire to preserve the natural environment, going from the heart’s wisdom, deep intuition of life and its interconnectedness of the species. However, attachment to nature and people improved the state of human individuality. Nature-connected people show a better state of happiness, life satisfaction, and mental health than people who are not connected with nature. 
 
 Both personal and social approaches should be encouraged in order to enhance people’s relation with nature. Schools and other institutions of learning have a critical function in promoting nature and initiative in offering opportunities to allow children’s engagement in nature activities. Thus, interaction with local natural communities, like urban gardens and nature reserves, can also improve this view. Thus, by understanding and developing these diverse forms of human-nature relations, the societies will be able to raise a generation with better sensitivity towards the environment and mental strength. 
 

 In this context, the current mainstream literature on the HHC mainly focuses on the availability of cognitive relationships with nature. This cognitive aspect entails acceptance of the significance of the natural environment in an individual’s literacy and for measuring environmental knowledge and awareness. Although human connections are necessary in understanding people’s cognition and experiences, the cognitive relations of people and nature might not encapsulate the dynamics of people’s connection with nature in their experiences. At times, it can impoverish nature to the extent that experiences and the context in which they appear are stripped of emotionality that is to a significant extent conducive to the formation of an emotional bond with the natural environment. 
 
 I pondered, storytelling is not the only way to engage feelings and bodily knowledge that are difficult to put into words. These methods, which encompass such areas as the usage of art, music, dancing, etc. , prevent people from just thinking with their heads, as they also appeal to their hearts and souls, thus making it possible to establish more holistic relationships with the nature. Art allows individuals to experiment with their emotions and ideas about nature and share that with others possibly in ways that same scientific studies could never reach. For instance, a painting of a forest trip made can make a person get a feeling they cannot describe when they are just told to go for a forest trip.Despite the that, by different art, one can reveal all feelings and perceptions of being in contact with the nature which can not be explained in the frames of the scientific methods and approaches. For example, viewing a painting which depicts a forest from a personal walk may have a rather profound and calming effect which cannot be described in just mere words. 
 
 The capability of art forms in the improvement of emotional relationships with nature one can hardly overestimate. Visual arts can paint landscapes from the nature and can help people develop a sort of respect for the creations. Consequently, music derived from nature sounds is capable of provoking related feelings from people’s biophilia. The author also applies the biophilia hypothesis while exploring nature sounds and their influence on people. In other words, dance as a type of movement can re-create the natural cycles and integrate the person into the natural environment. What can be said is that through the usage of modern artistic methods in the line of research and practice, enhanced emotional and sensory experience of nature may be achieved effectively enhancing the relationships people have with it. 
 

 Still, as clearly presented in this paper, arts-based research gives considerable potential for increasing human-nature connection, as well as the identification of unique limitations grounded in the method. The other significant limitation is that art is subjective and thus requires some form of creative interpretation, making it arduous to define and measure the results. As the interpretations depend on the perception of individual artists, the results obtained in this study can easily be distinguished into different clusters. Also, the time-bound and fluid productions as in the case of performance art and dance present several problems when it comes to documentation. 
 
 However, awareness of the aforementioned challenges does not preclude the usefulness of arts-based methods in enriching quantitative and/or qualitative deep fem method practice and enhancing understanding of people’s interactions with the natural environment. Applying art, one can embrace emotions and experiences of nature relatedness that might remain unnoticed in empirico-hermeneutic research. These forms of integration may lead to the attainment of broader understanding of how people interact with nature or their environment. Also, arts-based methods include other populations and participants that may feel left out by scientific and logical approaches. 
 
 To emphasise the necessity of using arts-based approaches in combination with traditional ones, it is crucial to shift the paradigm of the recognition of the different types of knowledge. This requires effective research and practical cross-sector cooperation between scientists or scholars, artists, and educators to create methodological practices that will respect the achievements of every field.In order to strengthen the application of arts based research to the field studying human–nature relationships and contributing to the sustainability transformation, it is necessary to fully acknowledge the brought opportunities and challenges. 
 

 
 Thus, people’s return to nature is of great significance if one wants to combat the environmental and psychological problems which predominate in the 21st century. Published in 1973, Solnit’ and Carson’s arguments regarding the alienation from nature pertaining to the anthropology of climate change are instrumental in understanding the present and future relationship with the natural environment and the consequences of the changed paradigm for health and sustainability. Thus, enlarging people’s appreciation of nature adds to the likelihood of people assuming specific environmentally friendly behavioral changes and endorsing conservation. This connection also increases individual welfare as more time in natural environments seem to positively improve people’s mental and physical health. 
 
 Strengthening the affective bonds with the help of arts in the context of rescLA presents a promising approach for strengthening the human–nature bonds. People are suggested to fuse aesthetics into experiencing nature because art makes people feel deeply which enhances the perception of the natural world. Thus, it is possible to argue that non-cognitive engagement with the environment via arts-based methods can indeed enrich individuals’ knowledge and enhance the understanding of how they interact with nature, primarily by appealing to the emotional and somatic aspects of the participants. Such an approach can potentially promote greater awareness of the environment and commitment to its care, critical for stemming today’s environmental problems. 
 
 Lastly, restoring human-nature harmony can be regarded as not only enhancing individual satisfaction but also preserving the earth’s resources. Arts-based practices can be successfully included in research and practice to develop more appealing and effective approaches to foster people’s relations with nature. This may, in return, help in changing people’s perception hence changing the whole society’s culture when it comes to the disposition of the environment. Thus, acknowledging the significance of both cognitive and emotional attachment to nature, we can construct a society that is ready for the future and strives to overcome environmental problems.