Living in the world of consecutive connections, people have changed their ways of perceiving morality by using the internet. It also demonstrated a society filled with morality, ethical issues, cultural relativity, and transforming norms in the digital environment. In this article, they will discuss the ways the internet constantly affects the moral compass of people and alters their perception of right and wrong. 
 

 There are present historicist trends in the 20th century which led to the questions of whether there really is such a thing as moral facts. J. L. Mackie, in his work *Ethics: Entitled *Inventing Right and Wrong*, the author of this book agrees with what is referred to as an “error theory. ” This is mainly the idea that moral facts do not exist; rather they are fictions. The internet takes this subjectivity further by adding to our vision other cultures and ways of perceiving things. 
 The internet is one big storage of ideas; ideas originating from different corners of the globe. This convergence raises an increased awareness on the fact that values are more or less subjective. Thus, multiple moralities unfold as an intricate web in web forums, social networks, and online news media. A practice that may be considered okay within a certain culture may be considered a vice in another culture. This exposure may lead to relativism of morality, where the latter is defined as the lack of universal truths of morality, and the recognition of views as relativistic. 
 Additionally, online interactions are characterized by anonymity and distance, which makes people bolder to share opinions that they can only contain during an equivalent interaction. Such a consequence can be construed as leading to a less hypocritical but possibly more black-and-white debate about morality. Unlike traditional media that offers a immediate social consequence once a particular message is disseminated, new media provides more freedom of opinion and consequently one’s ethical perspective may be questioned or strengthened. Therefore, the Internet does not only manifest the subjectivity of values but also actively contributes to processes of their emerging and recontextualization. 

 Moral debates take place online which means that people or communities discuss what constitutes ‘good’ but with the internet’s scale, there is moral scattering. To the one’s observation, charitable giving seems laudable, while to the other camp, it might signify destructive action. It makes the qualitative differences of the digital world more diffuse between black and white certainties and relative opinions. 
 The meaning of the term ‘good’ is far from clear and the digital age only complicates the issue at hand. In such platforms like the social media, for instance, campaigns for social justice can at the same time be described as noble and excessive depending on the side that is doing the analysis. This dichotomy seems to encapsulate the cry that has been given by people regarding the moral structure that has been created by internet. Due to the nature of the information flow, any values, ideas, and beliefs can be shared within a short timespan, and it is difficult to define what members of society want for the common good. 
 Also, filters that offer content that is specifically relevant to the user’s interest makes people to be in bubbles where they only get to see things that they want to see. Such a selective exposure can only reinforce moral solidarity because people are less willing to encounter opposing viewpoints. The digital environment hence makes it easy for different and in some cases conflicting moral positions to be aired and then partitioned. 
 In addition, the detachment brought about by the internet cancels moral ordering that is fixed in society’s cultures and norms. While anonymous individuals can create discussions free of prejudice, racists, sexual harassers or fabricators of fake news also thrive in the online world, thus presenting cyber space as anything but purely moral. These negative behaviors show that there is centrality for ethics in the digital world, thus, there’s a need to question and define what is good or good enough repetitively . 
 

 Thus, morality is present in the process of working with online content. In light of this, it is evident that our actions represent new courses of ethical conduct as we see it in the sharing of information, fight against the spread of fake news, and establishment of positive attitudes. Internet makes people wonder about the rationale of decisions – are they made according to some principles or prejudices? 
 Specifically, people do not always realize that even communicative exchanges over the internet have moral demands that are attached to them. For instance, the sharing of information especially on social networks comes with the risk of that information being correct. Disinformation is a serious problem, as it influences public health, politics, and people’s trust in institutions. 
 Another sheer moral responsibility is to encourage people on social media to be empathetic. This entails that digital communication does not have some of the attributes of face-to-face communication in regard to dehumanization. Nevertheless, promoting empathy in the online communication processes can close the existing gap. Therefore, any dialogue that is respectable, taking into account the opinion of every person and accepting people as human beings, can help to make the Internet environment a handful of stones. This process implies participation and thus consistent effort to be understanding with others. 
 
 Furthermore, the internet has made one question the rationale of moral actions. Is our decision out of the desire to seek the approval of other people, to have some benefits, or due to our sense of professional integrity? On the other hand, recognizing our drivers can assist for actions to be based on our principles and hence, be moral. Precisely in today’s climate, where everything that one does virtually is not only seen but remembered, this self-awareness is most important to keep an ethical self on the Web. 
 

 Studying the internet makes us face the challenges of the globalization process since it can be considered all-embracing. What effects of our moral decisions are there on people in other countries, people of other cultures, and those with other religion? The current world is digital, and it is high time people move past their petty perspectives as it presents everyone as equal. These are the main areas of ethical concern: I Algorithms, II privacy, III digital rights. 
 Abstractness, that is, using moral behavior for all types of individuals, becomes relevant in the context of the digital world. The internet brings people according to their differences, and this is why influences of our actions are nonsensical to ignore. For example, a social media campaign begun in a particular country may spread to the rest of the nations within a short span and cause impose on different cultures. This interconnectivity raises questions on how the actions initiated are in accordance with the highest ethical standards of justice, equality and human dignity. 
 Privacy is one of the ethical issues under this category. The tremendous amount of people’s data collected via Internet yields concerns for an informed consent, surveillance, and the right to privacy. Analytical models for observing and predicting can work in the benefit of forging an individualized encounter yet can also contain the dangers of deception and abuse. Sustaining these considerations calls for honoring civil liberties without compromising on the overall welfare of society in the world of digital. 
 

 
 Technology again brings the relationships closer and obfuscate the self-interest and the collective interest. Self-interest, likes, shares, and retweets always fight with actual kindness. In this morality marked by interconnectivity and technologically facilitated exchange, the internet’s moral backdrop poses the question: what is the proffered object of ethical measurement – self-interest or the common good? 
 
 Relationships between people Provocative manners which are popular on the Internet encourage selfishness through such stimulants as likes, sharing, and number of followers. They can propel people towards the culture where personal success and approval matter most at the expense of others’ well-being. For instance, the content, which has a high rating, will be further developed despite all the negative consequences and ethical issues. What substitutes altruism can lead to is self-promotion, creating thus a new digital culture that derives from society’s well-being and instead focuses on the self. 
 
 At the same time, the Internet offers prospects to enhance the concepts of the general well-being. Sites such as donation and crowdfunding, social networks, and communities can collect money for different purposes, which proves that people are charitable even in the digital world. Such organizations’ work emphasizes the benefits of acting as a team and the necessity to think about what goes on the Web. Such activities and causes can help improve the equality and empathy of people in this world through the use of internet. 
 
 New obstacles exist in trying to define the object of morality in the practically postmodern current epoch: the preservation of personal desire and individual welfare are here inextricably connected to the wellbeing of society. This demands a cultural change, where people understand that everything they do has its significance in the larger societal and or even global context. One gets the impression that stressing ethical aspects of interactions in the sphere of cyberspace can solicit a positive change to existent liberal tendencies.

 Empathy can also be seen as an important element of practical morality engaged on the Internet. That can lead to such phenomenon as dehumanization because real people involved in a conversation are far, thus it is difficult to understand all the nuances. Empathy is the acknowledgement of the other person’s point of view, listening and treating them with compassion. With empathy, it can be possible to raise awareness and change people’s attitudes for better since there will be less conflict and more acceptance in the virtual environment. 
 This means that there is need for the people to develop what can be referred to as ’skepticism or critical literacy in respect to the internet’. This includes applying analytical skills in comprehending and discerning genuine sources of information and knowledge; and being conversant with the processes of the new media, search engine operations, algorithms, and data security. Through supporting digital literacy, people are able to make their choices, listen, not get scammed and be more constructive. This set of heuristic moral norms will assist in making the right decisions concerning the moral substrate of the internet mileage. 
 

 Thus, in the world of cyberspace, which is constantly changing, the moral matrix appears to be flexible, and it poses questions to us. While we redraw the boundary between right and wrong in the new world of the digital, we should aim at the delineation that will pointed to a better, kinder, and more connected world. 
 It is important to note that the internet mirrors how society thinks, but at the same time, it also defines it. It opens up a huge pandora box of views, gives one a different outlook on life and makes one question moral standards and values. Although there are some moral issues in informatics, which are hard to solve, if a person will be using the computer daily, he/she have to use the tips mentioned to keep the moral level high and become a responsible member of the online community. 
 As we proceed in our use of this powerful tool called the internet let us consider the consequences that comes with it. Thus, thinking about exclusion and inclusion and remembering that freedom and responsibility do not exclude each other, as well as advocating for the principles of #ethics, we can contribute to the development of a ‘better’ Internet space. Thus, united we can bring the best of the Internet and create a better world that is kinder, stronger and united.